Thematic, innovative and bespoke investment solutions and thinking
Before you use our website we need you to know this. Click on each section for the full information.
We do not offer investment advice to private investors

Absolute Return Partners does not offer investment advice to private investors (Retail Clients as defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority). All such investors are advised to contact Quartet Investment Managers on +44 20 8939 2920 or visit

Our website does not give investment advice

The information contained on the website you are about to access (Website) is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as advice on which reliance should be placed, nor is it an offer by Absolute Return Partners LLP (ARP) to enter into any contract or investment agreement or a solicitation to buy or sell any investment in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances. Any information provided in relation to a specific fund is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make any investment decision as any such decision requires careful study of the offering memorandum of the relevant fund.

Information about Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes is not intended for the general public

No information on the Website is intended to amount to the financial promotion of Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes which are not authorized or recognised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and cannot be promoted to the general public. Any such information is intended solely for certain classes of investors permitted to receive it under relevant legislation and regulations, including investors falling within the qualifying categories set out the Conduct of Business Rules contained in the FCA Handbook or in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemptions) Order 2005, in each case as amended or replaced from time to time. This is because such investors are sufficiently experienced and sophisticated to understand the risks associated with such investments, including the possibility of a substantial loss or complete loss of their investment.

Our website stores information on your device

Our website uses technologies, such as cookies, to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site. We do not use these technologies for third-party related advertising or for storing/collecting personal information. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.

You accept our Terms and Privacy Policy when using our website

Before accessing the Website you should carefully read the terms set out in our Terms of Website Use and our Privacy Policy as these will apply to the entire contents of the Website and to any correspondence between us and you.

By accessing any part of the Website you are indicating that you accept these terms and that you agree to abide by them. If you do not accept these terms, do not use the Website.
Agree and close
April 2023

How Terminal Is Terminal?

How Terminal Is Terminal?

Consumer expectations suggest a recession is imminent. Labour market statistics paint a very different story. Who should you trust, and which numbers should you focus on, if the aim is to second-guess the Fed and how much higher the policy rate is likely to go?

Open this issue (PDF)

The ultimate level of interest rates is likely to be higher than previously anticipated.”

Jerome Powell, March 2023

The dilemma

A tricky situation is unfolding, making it rather difficult for the Federal Reserve Bank to honour earlier promises to gradually ease off in its ongoing fight against inflation.  Here is the dilemma confronting the Fed:  Consumer confidence is a trustworthy indicator of economic conditions.  When the expectations index falls much faster than the current situations index, a recession is usually around the corner (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1: Consumer confidence: Expectations index less current conditions index
Sources: Bloomberg, The Daily Shot

As you can see, we are now in recessionary territory, hence why Jerome Powell has been quite eager to ease off, but this is where his problems begin.  The US labour market is telling a very different story.  Despite consumer expectations having shrunk dramatically, US companies continue to recruit as if nothing has changed.  As you can see in Exhibit 2, new jobs continue to be created at twice the pace of workers being dismissed.

Exhibit 2: US job openings / unemployment level  
Sources: FRED, The Daily Shot

You have to go all the way back to 1969 to find the US unemployment rate at a lower level than it was in January.  Admittedly, it rose modestly in February (from 3.4% to 3.6%), but the number of unemployed Americans is still very far from recessionary levels.  As you can see in Exhibit 3 below, a recession always unfolds, when the unemployment rate rises by 1% or more over a 12-month period.  The rise in February was well below that.

Exhibit 3: Unemployment vis-à-vis recession  
Source: Bloomberg

The problem with this argument is that the unemployment rate is not a leading but a lagging indicator.  Just because the unemployment rate has not yet risen 1%, it can still happen if we assume the US economy is softening.  Furthermore, the unemployment rate doesn’t necessarily need to rise by 1% over a 12-month period for a recession to unfold.  Recessions can happen for other reasons.

More insight, more advice, more in-depth.

Professional investors can now subscribe to a range of our research and strategic thinking. Sign up now for access to in-depth papers and webinars!
Learn more about ARP+

Which way is the Fed leaning?

If the labour market tells a very different story than consumer confidence statistics do, the Fed is entitled to be confused.  Therefore, investors need to take a view, as to which side the Fed is leaning.  At this point in time, Jerome Powell’s recent testimony in Congress (which you can read about here) is probably your best guideline, and Powell was quite explicit in his verdict:  “The ultimate level of interest rates is likely to be higher than previously anticipated”.

Within minutes of Powell testifying, the market-implied terminal rate had risen to 5.7% (Exhibit 4), a number that should be compared to the current Fed Funds rate, which is 4.75-5.00%.  It was raised 25 bps at the last FOMC meeting, which took place a few weeks after Powell’s testimony in Congress, and after the regional banking crisis broke out.  In other words, as things stand, investors don’t expect the Fed to radically change course as a result of the ongoing banking crisis.

Exhibit 4: US market-implied terminal rate of Fed funds rate
Source: The Daily Shot

What to expect

In the first few days, following Powell’s testimony in Congress, analysts were busy adjusting their expectations.  Take for example Blackrock.  They are now of the opinion that the policy rate will probably peak at 6% (see here).  As Rick Rieder, CIO of Global Fixed Income at Blackrock, said:  “We think there’s a reasonable chance that the Fed will have to bring the Fed Funds rate to 6%, and then keep it there for an extended period to slow the economy and get inflation down to near 2%.”

Although I don’t disagree with Rick Rieder that, as a consequence of the robust US labour market, the terminal rate will most likely be higher than current consensus expectations, I am not at all convinced that 6% will suffice.  A very important lesson I learnt during the last major spike in inflation around 1980 was that economic agents (whether borrowers or lenders) must be disincentivised big time for lending to be curtailed.  Back then, excessive lending was a big part of the problem, and that isn’t much different today.  If net interest margins are good, and the economic outlook reasonably robust, neither side will be disincentivised by 6%.  Based on that observation, 7-8%, possibly even more, may be required to curtail lending.  If that were to happen, equities could fall a fair bit further.

There are two counterarguments to that observation.  First and foremost, the meltdown of Silicon Valley Bank, and the ensuing regional banking crisis, could have widespread implications, but it is too early to tell.  SVB in itself isn’t big enough to cause any systemic problems, but small and mid-sized banks in general account for too big a share of overall lending in the US for the crisis to be unproblematic.  Therefore, should contagion become meaningful, you should expect the Fed to change course.

Secondly, I remain convinced that central bankers may not mind inflation running ahead of targets for a while, reason being that inflation destroys debt.  You’ll probably never get a central banker to admit to such a strategy, but the argument makes sense in a world that is drowning in debt.  And, precisely for that reason, I would love to be a fly on the wall when the next FOMC meeting takes place.

Niels C. Jensen

3 April 2023

Investment Megatrends

Our investment philosophy, and everything we do at ARP, is driven by the long-term Investment Megatrends which are identified and routinely debated by our investment team.

Related Investment Megatrends

Our investment philosophy, and everything we do at ARP, is driven by the long-term Investment Megatrends which are identified and routinely debated by our investment team. Read more about related Megatrend/s for this article:

About the Author

Niels Clemen Jensen founded Absolute Return Partners in 2002 and is Chief Investment Officer. He has over 30 years of investment banking and investment management experience and is author of The Absolute Return Letter.

In 2018, Harriman House published The End of Indexing, Niels' first book.

What are your thoughts? Leave a comment